Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Aich et al 2014, Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow.pdf3,6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large African river basins
Authors: Aich, V.Liersch, S.Vetter, T.Huang, S.Tecklenburg, J.Hoffmann, P.Koch, H.Fournet, S.Krysanova, V.Müller, E.N.Hattermann, F.F.
Publishers Version:
Issue Date: 2014
Published in: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Vol. 18 (2014), No. 4
Publisher: Göttingen : Copernicus GmbH
Abstract: This study aims to compare impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large representative African river basins: the Niger, the Upper Blue Nile, the Oubangui and the Limpopo. We set up the eco-hydrological model SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model) for all four basins individually. The validation of the models for four basins shows results from adequate to very good, depending on the quality and availability of input and calibration data. <br><br> For the climate impact assessment, we drive the model with outputs of five bias corrected Earth system models of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) for the representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5. This climate input is put into the context of climate trends of the whole African continent and compared to a CMIP5 ensemble of 19 models in order to test their representativeness. Subsequently, we compare the trends in mean discharges, seasonality and hydrological extremes in the 21st century. The uncertainty of results for all basins is high. Still, climate change impact is clearly visible for mean discharges but also for extremes in high and low flows. The uncertainty of the projections is the lowest in the Upper Blue Nile, where an increase in streamflow is most likely. In the Niger and the Limpopo basins, the magnitude of trends in both directions is high and has a wide range of uncertainty. In the Oubangui, impacts are the least significant. Our results confirm partly the findings of previous continental impact analyses for Africa. However, contradictory to these studies we find a tendency for increased streamflows in three of the four basins (not for the Oubangui). Guided by these results, we argue for attention to the possible risks of increasing high flows in the face of the dominant water scarcity in Africa. In conclusion, the study shows that impact intercomparisons have added value to the adaptation discussion and may be used for setting up adaptation plans in the context of a holistic approach.
Keywords: Climate change; Digital storage; Earth (planet); Stream flow; Watersheds; Climate change impact; Climate impact assessment; Coupled Model Intercomparison Project; Earth system model; Eco-hydrological models; Holistic approach; Hydrological extremes; Integrated modeling; Climate models; climate change; climate effect; comparative study; model validation; river basin; streamflow; twenty first century; Africa
DDC: 550
License: CC BY 3.0 Unported
Link to License:
Appears in Collections:Umweltwissenschaften

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons