Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tennant et al - Open Source and Open Scholarship - 2.pdf973,68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship
Authors: Tennant, Jonathan P.Agrawal, RitwikBaždarić, KsenijaBrassard, DavidCrick, TomDunleavy, Daniel J.Evans, Thomas RhysGardner, NicholasGonzalez-Marquez, MonicaGraziotin, DanielGreshake Tzovaras, BastianGunnarson, DanielHavemann, JohannaHosseini, MohammadKatz, Daniel S.Knöchelmann, MarcelLahti, LeoMadan, Christopher R.Manghi, PaoloMarocchino, AlbertoMasuzzo, PaolaMurray-Rust, PeterNarayanaswamy, SanjayNilsonne, GustavPacheco-Mendoza, JosmelPenders, BartPourret, OlivierRera, MichaelSamuel, JohnSteiner, TobiasStojanovski, JadrankaUribe Tirado, AlejandroVos, RutgerWorthington, SimonYarkoni, Tal
Publishers Version:
Issue Date: 2020
Published in: SocArXiv (2020)
Publisher: Charlottesville, VA : Center for Open Science
Abstract: There is no clear-cut boundary between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship, and the histories, practices, and fundamental principles between the two remain complex. In this study, we critically appraise the intersections and differences between the two movements. Based on our thematic comparison here, we conclude several key things. First, there is substantial scope for new communities of practice to form within scholarly communities that place sharing and collaboration/open participation at their focus. Second, Both the principles and practices of FOSS can be more deeply ingrained within scholarship, asserting a balance between pragmatism and social ideology. Third, at the present, Open Scholarship risks being subverted and compromised by commercial players. Fourth, the shift and acceleration towards a system of Open Scholarship will be greatly enhanced by a concurrent shift in recognising a broader range of practices and outputs beyond traditional peer review and research articles. In order to achieve this, we propose the formulation of a new type of institutional mandate. We believe that there is substantial need for research funders to invest in sustainable open scholarly infrastructure, and the communities that support them, to avoid the capture and enclosure of key research services that would prevent optimal researcher behaviours. Such a shift could ultimately lead to a healthier scientific culture, and a system where competition is replaced by collaboration, resources (including time and people) are shared and acknowledged more efficiently, and the research becomes inherently more rigorous, verified, and reproducible.
Keywords: Collaboration; Communities; FLOSS; FOSS; Free Software; Open Access; Open Data; Open Research; Open Scholarship; Open Science; Open Source; Replicability; Reproducibility; Scholarly Communication; Scholarly Publishing; Sharing
DDC: 020
License: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Link to License:
Appears in Collections:Informationswissenschaften

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons