Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
amt-9-4935-2016.pdf1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Assessment of lidar depolarization uncertainty by means of a polarimetric lidar simulator
Authors: Bravo-Aranda, Juan AntonioBelegante, LivioFreudenthaler, VolkerAlados-Arboledas, LucasNicolae, DoinaGranados-Muñoz, María JoséGuerrero-Rascado, Juan LuisAmodeo, AldoD'Amico, GiusseppeEngelmann, RonnyPappalardo, GelsominaKokkalis, PanosMamouri, RodanthyPapayannis, AlexNavas-Guzmán, FranciscoOlmo, Francisco JoséWandinger, UllaAmato, FrancescoHaeffelin, Martial
Publishers Version:
Issue Date: 2016
Published in: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Volume 9, Issue 10, Page 4935-4953
Publisher: München : European Geopyhsical Union
Abstract: Lidar depolarization measurements distinguish between spherical and non-spherical aerosol particles based on the change of the polarization state between the emitted and received signal. The particle shape information in combination with other aerosol optical properties allows the characterization of different aerosol types and the retrieval of aerosol particle microphysical properties. Regarding the microphysical inversions, the lidar depolarization technique is becoming a key method since particle shape information can be used by algorithms based on spheres and spheroids, optimizing the retrieval procedure. Thus, the identification of the depolarization error sources and the quantification of their effects are crucial. This work presents a new tool to assess the systematic error of the volume linear depolarization ratio (δ), combining the Stokes–Müller formalism and the complete sampling of the error space using the lidar model presented in Freudenthaler (2016a). This tool is applied to a synthetic lidar system and to several EARLINET lidars with depolarization capabilities at 355 or 532 nm. The lidar systems show relative errors of δ larger than 100 % for δ values around molecular linear depolarization ratios (∼ 0.004 and up to ∼  10 % for δ = 0.45). However, one system shows only relative errors of 25 and 0.22 % for δ = 0.004 and δ = 0.45, respectively, and gives an example of how a proper identification and reduction of the main error sources can drastically reduce the systematic errors of δ. In this regard, we provide some indications of how to reduce the systematic errors.
Keywords: aerosol; algorithm; error analysis; error correction; lidar; particulate matter; polarization; shape analysis
DDC: 550
License: CC BY 3.0 Unported
Link to License:
Appears in Collections:Geowissenschaften

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons